Archive for ‘The Solution’

Soil fertility key to African green revolution

Monday, May 24th, 2010

RECOMMEND CATEGORIES: ORGANIC FARMING

Replenishing soil fertility with mineral and organic fertilisers could triple cereal crop yields in tropical Africa and achieve an African green revolution, says Pedro A. Sánchez from the Earth Institute.

Staple crop yields have not risen from one tonne per hectare in most of tropical Africa since the 1960s. The problem, according to Sánchez, is decades of farming without adequate fertiliser that have “stripped the soils of the vital nutrients needed to support plant growth”.

The eighty ‘Millennium Villages’, set up in 2005 across ten African countries to promote community-led development, show the extent to which better soil fertility improves yields. Through mineral fertiliser applications, improved cultivars and the latest agronomic knowledge, maize yields have surpassed three tons per hectare in 78 per cent of village households, says Sánchez.

And at a national level, Malawi’s fertiliser subsidy scheme — that gives farmers two-thirds off the market price of mineral fertilisers — has increased maize production from 0.8 tonnes per hectare in 2005 to 2.2 in 2007. The scheme has transformed the country from a receiver of food aid to a food exporter and donor, says Sánchez.

To build on these initial successes, African countries must now focus on adding organic fertilisers to their soils. “Only organic fertilisers add carbon, feed soil microbes and help to retain soil moisture”, writes Sánchez. The best way of applying them, he adds, is to grow leguminous trees that capture nitrogen from the air and transfer it to the soil.

Such ‘nitrogen-fixing’ trees could capture 50–100 kilogrammes of nitrogen per hectare per year in tropical Africa — similar to the amount added by mineral fertilisers. They have the added benefit of providing fuel wood.

Source: Soil fertility key to African green revolution – sciDev Net

Date: 24 May 2010

Bolivia to swap organic food for Finnish technology: Morales

Saturday, May 22nd, 2010

RECOMMEND CATEGORIES: ORGANIC PRODUCTS

Bolivian President Evo Morales said Saturday he would like Finland to provide his country with “clean technology,” and in exchange Bolivia would send organic products to the Nordic country.

“We could protect our Mother Earth together,” Morales told reporters in Helsinki during the first official visit by a Bolivian president to Finland.

“Finland could provide Bolivia with clean technology, while Bolivia could supply organic products to Finland,” he said through a translator, without specifying the technology he had in mind.

“But there are technologies to do it while taking care of Mother Earth … Bolivia is a developing country, but we want to develop using clean technology,” he said.

“Actually, there are two paths: to save capitalism or to save Mother Earth,” he said, pointing out that ” the earth can live without humankind, but humankind cannot live without Mother Earth.”

Source: Bolivia to swap organic food for Finnish technology: Morales – France24

Date: 22 May 2010

Organics are the future, but fund-less

Friday, May 21st, 2010

The organics sector got a report but no money on Budget Day despite clear evidence of growth and huge potential for further export earnings, the Green Party said today.

Ministers Tim Groser and John Carter insulted the organics sector, according to the Green Party’s Rural Affairs spokesperson Kevin Hague, choosing Budget Day to launch the New Zealand Organic Report when the Budget contained absolutely nothing for the sector and John Key’s Government had discontinued funding to help farmers shift to organic methods.

“Organic farming creates much higher value products than traditional farming. Despite this, the Government has failed to fund Organics Aotearoa New Zealand (OANZ) and the programme that helps farmers make the switch to organics,” said Mr Hague.

The Otago University report shows organic farming is now a $485 million dollar industry with significant environmental benefits and further economic potential. OANZ has a value target of $1 billion by 2013.

“It is essential for a smart economy that we support high-value commodity products such as organics. Our producers are doing a great job and there’s potential to keep on expanding,” said Mr Hague.

The report showed the organics sector’s spectacular growth corresponded with the Organics Advisory Programme (OAP) which assisted farmers who wanted to make the shift to organics. The OAP was a Green Party initiative under the last Government.

“There is a growing domestic and international market for organic products,” Mr Hague said.

“Supporting our organics industry would benefit the economy, the environment, and help to make our clean green brand a reality.”

Source: Organics are the future, but fund-less – Scoop

Date: 21 May 2010

N.Korea’s Kim: committed to denuclearisation

Friday, May 7th, 2010

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il told Chinese President Hu Jintao in talks this week in Beijing that he remained committed to ending his country’s nuclear drive, Chinese state media said Friday.

Kim also told Hu that his country would “work with China to create favourable conditions” for restarting six-nation talks hosted by Beijing on dismantling the Pyongyang’s nuclear programmes, Xinhua news agency said.

Source: N.Korea’s Kim: committed to denuclearisation – france24

Date: 7 May, 2010

‘Iron hand’ to help realize green goals

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

Premier Wen Jiabao on Wednesday vowed to realize the country’s green goal to cut energy intensity by 20 percent between 2006 and 2010, amid the strong economic recovery.

In a nationwide video and teleconference, Wen told governments at all levels to work with an “iron hand” to eliminate inefficient enterprises.

To that effect, he laid out new targets to shut down the outdated 10 GW capacity of small thermal power plants, 25 million tons of iron smelting, 6 million tons of steel production, 50 million tons of cement, 330,000 tons of aluminum, 6 million containers of glass sheets and 530,000 tons of paper production within this year.

The new targets should be distributed to local governments and enterprises by the end of this month. All the enterprises should also be closed down by the end of the third quarter.

Local officials and executives of enterprises will be taken to task if their specific energy-efficiency targets are not met by the end of the year. Over the past four years, the use of energy per unit of GDP has fallen by 14.38 percent, but this is still far short of the national goal of a 20 percent drop during the five years ending in 2010, the State Council said in a statement.

Source: ‘Iron hand’ to help realize green goals – China Daily

Date: 6 May, 2010

World’s largest geothermal turbine in NZ

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

The largest geothermal turbine in the world has been constructed just north of Taupo at a new power station which runs renewable energy.

The power station has diminished the threat of power cuts, especially at a time when New Zealand is facing a dry winter.

The energy stripped out of the geothermal turbine will power around 140,000 homes.

That is about 3 percent of all the power the country needs.

Source: World’s largest geothermal turbine in NZ – English.cntv.cn

Date: 6 May, 2010

Five-a-day has little impact on cancer, study finds

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Eating more fruit and vegetables has only a modest effect on protecting against cancer, a study into the link between diet and disease has found.

The study of 500,000 Europeans joins a growing body of evidence undermining the high hopes that pushing “five-a-day” might slash Western cancer rates.

The international team of researchers estimates only around 2.5% of cancers could be averted by increasing intake.

But experts stress eating fruit and vegetables is still key to good health.

In 1990, the World Health Organization recommended that everyone consume at least five portions of fruit and vegetables a day to prevent cancer and other chronic diseases.

The advice has formed a central plank of public health campaigns in many developed countries. It has been promoted in the UK since 2003 and in the US for nearly two decades.

But research has failed to substantiate the suggestion that as many as 50% of cancers could be prevented by boosting the public’s consumption of fruit and vegetables.

This latest study, which analysed recruits from 10 countries to the highly-regarded European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, confirms that the association between fruit and vegetable intake and reduced cancer risk is indeed weak.

The team, led by researchers from the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, in New York, took into account lifestyle factors such as smoking and exercise when drawing their conclusions.

But writing in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, they said they could not rule out that even the small reduction in cancer risk seen was down to the fact that the kind of people who ate more fruit and vegetables lived healthier lives in many other respects too.

Broccoli not biscuits

In the best case scenario, an extra two portions of fruit and vegetables each day could prevent 2.6% of cancers in men and 2.3% of cases in women, the study concluded.

Vegetables, which tend to be richer in nutrients, appeared to be more beneficial than fruits, while heavy drinkers seemed to gain the most from a higher intake of both when it came to protection from cancers caused by alcohol and smoking.

In an accompanying editorial, Professor Walter Willet of Harvard University said the research strongly confirmed the findings of other studies, showing “that any association of intake and fruits and vegetables with risk of cancer is weak at best”.

But he stressed specific substances contained in certain fruit and vegetables, if harnessed, could still have an important, protective effect.

Substantial evidence suggests lycopene from tomatoes, for instance, may reduce the risk of prostate cancer, while chemicals in broccoli are thought to stimulate a gene which protects against bowel cancer.

And data still suggests fruit and vegetables may provide protection against cardiovascular disease, one of the major killers in the developed world – although this too has yet to be proven categorically.

Keeping lean

But while the links between diet and cancer remain unclear, obesity is now seen as an established risk factor.

Fruit and vegetables could therefore be beneficial just by virtue of taking the place of more calorific fare, health experts say.

In any event, a reduced risk of 2.5% should not be dismissed out of hand, the World Cancer Research Fund argues.

“For the UK, this works out as about 7,000 cases a year, which is a significant number,” says Dr Rachel Thompson from the charity, which in a major 1997 report said there was “convincing evidence” of the protective effect of fruit and vegetables.

Yinka Ebo of Cancer Research UK said: “It’s still a good idea to eat your five-a-day but remember that fruits and vegetables are pieces in a much larger lifestyle jigsaw.”

“There are many things we can do to lower our chances of developing cancer such as not smoking, keeping a healthy weight, cutting down on alcohol, eating a healthy balanced diet, being physically active and staying safe in the sun.”

Source: Five-a-day has little impact on cancer, study finds  – BBC UK

Date: 07 April 2010

Breaking News: UK Solar Now Affordable? Feed-In Tariffs Announced

Monday, February 1st, 2010

In Matthew’s original post on the introduction of UK feed-in tariffs for renewable energy, he hailed it as an ideological step forward for clean energy, but noted that without ambitious targets, the scheme might fall short of spurring the massive development of renewables industries seen in Germany and Spain. Concern over the level of tariff even spurred a public campaign for solar, calling for at least an additional 10p per kWh to achieve the full potential of this scheme. Today the waiting was over. So how’s it all looking now the government has announced its numbers?

This morning the UK government posted its official announcement about a renewables feed-in tariff. Looking at the numbers (We Support Solar has a useful summary of feed-in-tariff rates), it looks like the scheme is not going much past the initially announced figure of 36.5p per kWh—although retrofitted solar will initially get 41.2p (presumably to make up for the additional cost of installation compared to new build).

Yet while the run up to this announcement was marked by skepticism and concern from industry and green groups alike, worried that the feed-in tariffs would be too low, now the scheme has been announced, some at least are still hailing this as a huge leap forward for green tech in Britain.

Leading solar company Solar Century, (see my review of Solar Century’s inspiring book here) put out an early response arguing that this new scheme will finally make solar affordable for UK home owners, estimating that a typical household can now save and earn over £1,000 per year for 25 years, increasing with inflation, with a typical solar electric system. They also argued that this return is guaranteed and tax-free, making it a favorable bet compared to traditional savings and pensions. Solar Century executive chairman Jeremy Leggett had this to say:

Home energy generation and associated jobs have been given a huge boost today. The Government’s financial incentives for homes, communities and businesses to generate clean electricity marks the start of a solar revolution in the UK. For the UK to reach its carbon reduction targets, people have to be given the opportunity to generate their electricity in a rewarding and accessible way, this makes it possible.

It should be noted, of course, that Solar Century is in the business of selling solar—so while it was in their interests to push for an ambitious scheme before it was launched—now the money is available, they quite sensibly want to sell this scheme to potential customers. Others in the environmental community are less impressed. Friends of the Earth, for example, welcomed the scheme as a boost for renewables, but lamented its lack of ambition. FOE energy and climate campaigner Dave Timms had this to say:

The introduction of cash incentives to boost small scale green electricity generation is welcome – however, Ministers have been far too timid with a policy that could make a significant contribution to cutting emissions and boosting energy security. Installing renewable technologies will now be a good investment for many homes – but farmers, businesses, communities and others will get little or no extra incentive to invest in clean electricity.

So the initial take seems to be a mixed bag—good but could do better. Undoubtedly, many more UK households will now pursue solar or other micro-generation installations that would otherwise have waited—and that can only be a good thing for cash-strapped homes, for industry, for jobs and for our climate. But to get the kind of scaling up of renewables we need, let’s hope this is just a first step.

And before the complaints start rolling in about Government support for certain industries, let’s look at the historical role of Government in spurring technological development in everything from computers to aviation to automobiles. Existing, polluting industries don’t need Government subsidies (yet continue to receive them), new players most certainly do—even if it is just to level the playing field.

And with feed-in tariffs being launched everywhere from Gainesville, Florida to Ontario to South Africa to Australia, communities not enacting these schemes would do well to act now or get left behind. Overwhelming public support for feed-in tariffs in the UK (even the famously oil-friendly IEA supports feed-in tariffs!) shows that the political will is there, if only the entrenched interests of the fossil fuel lobbies would get out of the way.

Watch this space for more responses as the dust settles.

Source: Breaking News: UK Solar Now Affordable? Feed-In Tariffs Announced – Tree Hugger

Date: 01 February 2010

Results 21-28 of overall 28
REPORTS see all

Livestock Production and Shorter-Lived Climate Forcers

Download

Plant-Based Diets - A solution to our public health crisis

Download

Leaders Preserving Our Future - Insights Paper - WPF - November 2010

Download

Maintaining a Climate of Life - Summary Report

Download

Livestock's Climate Impact

Download

Livestock & Sustainable Food

Download

Reducing Shorter-Lived Climate Forcers Through Dietary Change

Download

The global cost of biodiversity loss: 14 trillion Euros? - EU Commission (2008)

Download

Forests, Fisheries, Agriculture: A Vision for Sustainability (2009)

Download

Global Biodiversity Outlook 3 - United Nations (2010)

Download

  • LATEST NEWS

  • Categories